| Title | Vol. 126 Local Finance Investment Appraisal System Current Status and Improvements (English Edition) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Views | 24 | Date | 2025-11-28 | ||
| File | |||||
|
▪ Growing local budgets and expanded local powers require stronger checks on whether projects make fiscal sense before approval.
▪ The effectiveness of local finance investment appraisals that evaluate the feasibility of fiscal projects ex-ante must be verified.
▪ Local fiscal investment appraisal screens projects before they start, checking whether they are needed and sensible to ensure smart spending and avoid wasteful duplication.
▪Investment appraisals decide if projects should progress by ensuring they are needed/sensible, fit economic/social policies, connect with other government plans, and use resources efficiently.
▪ Both review numbers and target resource amounts have grown recently, with Si/Gun/Gu self-reviews now comprising over half the total.
▪ Review differs from other local fiscal evaluations by checking feasibility before projects start, enabling real spending control.
▪ Some cities abuse exemption rules.
▪ Unclear rules on what counts as “obligations” lead to missed appraisals.
▪ Disconnected project reviews and management hinder effective budget use.
▪ Create better ways to catch projects dodging or skipping appraisals
▪ Develop detailed guidance on what projects need appraisal
▪ Build foundations for efficient budgeting through connected project analysis |
|||||